What a REIT Board Missed on 25 Properties, And What It Means For Your Next Deal
I was hired to evaluate 25 properties for a publicly traded REIT. The portfolio was a mix, repositioning projects, tenant buildout remodels, and new construction inside existing shells. I reported findings directly to the board. Weekly meetings. Real capital on the line.
Across those 25 properties, the same problem showed up in different forms every single time.
What Turned Up on the Repositioning Projects
The structural engineering was incomplete. Windstorm specifications were missing, in Houston that is not a footnote, it is a code requirement. Permit documentation had gaps that would have stopped work mid-construction. Lead times on specified materials had no listed alternatives, meaning one supply delay would have frozen the entire job with no contingency path.
What Turned Up on the Remodels
The issues were quieter but just as expensive. Wrong finish schedules. MEP work scoped for the previous tenant's layout with nobody catching the conflict. Change orders waiting to happen, written into the original bid in plain sight, if you knew how to read it.
What Turned Up on the New Builds
Three new construction projects inside a subdivided grocery shell. Nobody had accounted for the existing structural grid. Utility routing assumptions that did not match field conditions. The kind of problem that looks fine on paper until the first subcontractor shows up and realizes the drawings and the building are two different conversations.
The Pattern
All of it missed by the people whose job was to catch it.
The people reviewing your construction documents are almost never construction people. They are attorneys. Asset managers. Financial analysts. Smart people who are very good at their jobs and have no way to know what a contractor deliberately leaves out of a bid, what an engineer misses when moving fast, or what a permit gap looks like before it becomes a work stoppage.
This is not a criticism. It is just how the industry works. Construction is a specialty. Most investors treat it like a commodity.
It is not a commodity. It is where your margin lives or dies.
Why Contractors Write Bids This Way
The bid gaps across that portfolio were not accidents. Contractors write bids to win jobs. They know exactly what they are leaving out. The real scope surfaces after demolition starts, when walking away is no longer realistic.
That is a standard industry move. Everyone in construction knows what it is. The investors signing those contracts mostly do not.
What the Gap Actually Costs You
A missing line item in a bid is not just a budget problem. It is a timeline problem, a lender problem, a board problem, and sometimes a legal problem. By the time it surfaces it has already compounded into something that costs three times what preventing it would have.
The question is never whether the gap exists. It almost always does. The question is whether someone on your team found it before you signed.
What a Construction Consultant Does That Nobody Else Does
A good construction consultant sits between your capital and that problem. Before the contract is signed. Before the demo starts. Before the number that looked good on paper turns into a change order you had no budget for.
Not a project manager. Not an inspector. Someone who has been the contractor, the consultant, the inspector, and the investor, and knows what each one of them is thinking at every stage of a deal.
If you are a family office, a private equity group, or an institutional investor with real estate in your portfolio and you do not have that person on your team, you have a gap.
You should know what your contractor is thinking when they write that bid.
Let’s talk calendly.com/jeph-reit